13th July 2015
16 views

Should Royalty be able to be demoted?

Made by Hashir in Debates

Veteran
Master
3,526 posts
9,634
Seen 31st August 2023
13th July 2015, 07:08 PM

With lots of nerve and thought in my mind, I think Royalty should be able to be demoted, or their rank in power should be decreased.

In any way is it fair that mods have the pressure of being demoted, yet royal don't? Most of the princesses haven't been on in forever, and it is very unfair that mods get demoted for being inactive, yet Princesses can get it off easily because they're royal.

Perhaps they would be demoted, but it wouldn't make much sense if they're Damen's relatives in real life. In that case, maybe the royalty's power or rank should be decreased. As a previous moderator myself, I didn't find it fair at all that the Princesses could get off easily.

Now you may be wondering, why am I picking on Princesses specifically? Princes and Empress fall in the Administrator tier, so they are allowed to have separate rules from Moderators, based on timings.

In conclusion, Royalty should be able to be demoted, specifically princesses, but also royalty who are demoted/resign. As it wouldn't make sense to demote someone who is a true relative, maybe their specific rank should be decrease because I think this is in no way fair.


What do you think? (Note, this is a friendly debate not a war)
28

+1 by oh , Perla Gunnulfsen, Freddy, Swirlie and 24 others
"Behind this mask there is more than just flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea... and ideas are bulletproof." -V

Member
336 posts
314
Seen 9th October 2015
13th July 2015, 07:18 PM

I think its a bit unfair as how royal mods didnt get to participate in the vote off of mods, so yeah i agree
0

Hello there! Im Izzy! Also known as Redds]
via Imgflip Meme Maker

via Imgflip Meme Maker

night cruising
Master
2,329 posts
3,601
Seen 31st August 2023
13th July 2015, 07:27 PM

They should, because Princess is almost the same as Moderator, except they're higher in power and they're able to ascend the Throne and do royal things. So yes, I agree.
0

sayonara
Master
1,136 posts
1,842
Seen 5th June 2022
13th July 2015, 07:29 PM

I love you. o: You get me.
0

Administrator
2,338 posts
8,518
Seen 31st August 2023
13th July 2015, 07:30 PM

Hashir wrote on 13th July 2015 07:08 PM:
becuase

Well I think that typo should be corrected. :P


I also agree with you. I do believe that if Princesses are inactive, that they should be moved down from moderator to like have the powers of a Lord+Knight+PW, they would be able to arrest, kick, warn, whisper and goto. Also they would still be able to walk on walls. I think that would give them some power when they come on, but not all the power because of their inactivity.
2

+1 by Scott and Cheep

Kara
Administrator

Veteran
Master
3,526 posts
9,634
Seen 31st August 2023
13th July 2015, 07:34 PM

Kara Kacket wrote on 13th July 2015 07:30 PM:
Hashir said on 13th July 2015 07:08 PM:
becuase


Well I think that typo should be corrected.



I also agree with you. I do believe that if Princesses are inactive, that they should be moved down from moderator to like have the powers of a Lord+Knight+PW, they would be able to arrest, kick, warn, whisper and goto. Also they would still be able to walk on walls. I think that would give them some power when they come on, but not all the power because of their inactivity.
Caught me :(.

Fixed and nice opinion
2

+1 by Kara and Cheep
"Behind this mask there is more than just flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea... and ideas are bulletproof." -V

Veteran
Master
5,478 posts
17,111
Seen 29th August 2023
13th July 2015, 07:46 PM

I agree to be honest. Perhaps royalty should be demoted after a certain amount of inactivity. Or perhaps just make them a rank of themselves. Also sorry to hence your typing but they're a typo [forth paragraph down, first word (noe) should be now].

Sincerely,
-Sadie
0

Hi, I'm Scott.
[DSGHQ Veteran || Senior Captain || Master]

Questions, comments, concerns? Don't hesitate to message me.

night cruising
Master
2,329 posts
3,601
Seen 31st August 2023
13th July 2015, 07:46 PM

Hashir wrote on 13th July 2015 07:08 PM:
Noe

Typo, another one :P
0

Veteran
Master
3,526 posts
9,634
Seen 31st August 2023
13th July 2015, 07:48 PM

Sadie wrote on 13th July 2015 07:46 PM:
I agree to be honest. Perhaps royalty should be demoted after a certain amount of inactivity. Or perhaps just make them a rank of themselves. Also sorry to hence your typing but they're a typo [forth paragraph down, first word (noe) should be now].

Sincerely,
-Sadie
I got caught again :(
3

+1 by Scott, Cheep and Kara
"Behind this mask there is more than just flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea... and ideas are bulletproof." -V

Member
2,442 posts
2,608
Seen 26th February 2019
13th July 2015, 08:01 PM

Agreed. If any rank is inactive and gets demoted, at least demote them by 1 rank.
0

Daymen
Administrator
5,165 posts
37,117
Seen 16th December 2024
13th July 2015, 08:04 PM

When you become Royal you are bound to the Royal Legacy forever and cannot be 'demoted' like a staff member. And yes, it's very unfair which is what makes being Royal so special.
9

+1 by Cheep, T R A P S O U L, McKinlee, Kara and 5 others

Login or join the forums to reply.