Lela67 said on 13th March 2016 03:52 PM:
it's okay, I'm 9 & ppl make mistakes, so don't feel bad



Darm, Your One Year Older Then Chris.

Mal Ren said on 13th March 2016 01:13 PM:
Umm,
You didn't make these quotes..
There is a rule where you must give credit to the creator of a quote (refrence)

Thanks,
-Mal

He never said he made them and he probably found them from a website excluding the names of the creators.

Here's my opinion on the new rule: I agree with the punishments given to those who abuse their powers, but what I feel is that these will almost never be enforced, or there will be a way to give them back their rank. Another thing is that some punishments are based on specific people. Damen doesn't want certain people to be demoted, so there's going to be a way around his own rules to make sure said people won't get demoted. I'm just saying, I've seen rules not be enforced before, and I bet we'll see that again.

Another thing is that I saw a lot of people on the discussion say one of two things. One was, "Great rule! I'm sure no ranked user would ever abuse their power, nor would I think they ever have!" I also saw, "Good rule! I'm positive this rule will make sure no one will abuse their power anymore." The thing is: ranked users still will abuse their powers! You can't deny it, and no punishment will stop them. The rule will not be enforced, and if it is, certain people will be excused from it! It is just like any other rule created in the DSGHQ; we're making users and ranks equal, yet some are always going to be more equal than the rest. They'll always have more leeway than the rest of us. If you don't know what leeway is, here's the dictionary definition: [an allowable margin of freedom or variation]

This isn't a rant about how unfair the DSGHQ is; it's about how uneven the new rule is. If you look at the discussion again, you'll see that the only true punishment is for Moderators. The other ranks basically get probation, but never demotion. You might say to me that Administrators could get demoted, but the post says "may be demoted". Yes, it could be seen that I look too much into things, but it's basically saying Administrators and other ranks are excused for whatever drama they might cause. Moderators seem to always get the worst of it; if the DSGHQ were a restaurant, they would be the permanent trainees or dish scrubbers. If one thing sets their boss off, they're out.

I might be seeing things differently than you do, so please tell you your feedback of what you think about the new rule. I want your honest opinion, not what you would say if you're trying to earn a rank. Don't worry! Nothing will happen to you if you tell your honest opinion, it's not like they can take that away from you too!

Srry this is sorted now please delete this post

~ Misteh